Investors Take Stock of M&A Talks
[ad_1]
Would the combination of Warner Bros. Discovery and Paramount Global — two companies heavily tied to the declining legacy TV biz — make financial sense?
Investors reacted to news of early talks between Warner Bros. Discovery and Paramount about a potential merger, which broke just prior to market close Wednesday. In early trading Thursday, shares of Paramount Global and WBD were both down around 4%.
Year to date, Paramount Global shares are down more than 9%. Meanwhile, Warner Bros. Discovery shares are up more than 22% so far in 2023.
Wall Street wasn’t completely surprised to hear about WBD and Paramount Global’s merger talks, with many observers anticipating near-term M&A activity in the sector. “[W]e think these desperate times for media companies are leading them to explore desperate measures,” MoffettNathanson analyst Robert Fishman opined in a Dec. 21 research note.
Paramount Global’s shares rose more than 12% earlier this month on word that Paramount Global chair Shari Redstone had discussed her sale of her shares of National Amusements Inc. (representing a controlling stake in Paramount) with Skydance Media’s David Ellison. Those talks were first reported by Puck on Dec. 7.
The talks between WBD and Paramount are at the very earliest stage, with Warner Bros. Discovery chief David Zaslav and Paramount Global CEO Bob Bakish having broached the possibility of a union at a Dec. 19 lunch meeting. Sources said Zaslav was motivated to explore a WBD-Paramount combination given the chatter about Skydance’s talks to buy out Redstone’s NAI stake. There are a number of questions about how a deal might come together.
And other M&A outcomes are certainly possible. Comcast/NBCUniversal is “the third leg to this M&A merry-go-round conversation,” as Comcast CEO Brian Roberts looks to scale up to compete with Disney, Fishman wrote in the note. “At the end of the day, Comcast may be the one strategic buyer with the capital structure and assets required to benefit either WBD or [Paramount] in a long-term viable way,” he wrote.
Terms of a potential Warner Bros. Discovery-Paramount Global merger aren’t known. But “WBD would likely be paying a hefty premium for a quickly declining linear TV business, allowing it to again double-down on its own pressured business,” Fishman noted.
Any cost-savings from a combined WBD-Paramount by shutting down Paramount+ “would be smaller than they appear as most content costs associated with the service would merely shift to back to linear rather than disappear,” Fishman added. “Even together, the two would struggle to build a scaled streaming service that would allow the combined company to remain viable as linear cash flows fade away.”
WBD acquiring Paramount Global’s shares in a mostly debt-driven deal would be a “bad idea,” Wells Fargo Securities’ Stephen Cahall wrote in a Thursday note to clients.
In such a scenario, assuming a 30% premium and 20%/80% ratio of equity/debt financing, the combined company would have an estimated $97 billion enterprise value — and whopping debt of around $70 billion. Pro-forma revenue would be $72 billion (50% coming from linear TV) and $13 billion in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (about 90% from linear TV business).
“WBD’s debt has been a problem since the merger, and this would only magnify melting ice cube sensitivities,” Cahall wrote. As of the end of Q3, Warner Bros. Discovery’s long-term debt was $43.5 billion, while Paramount Global’s was $15.6 billion.
In another potential M&A scenario, WBD and Paramount could merge in an all-stock deal, similar to the structure of Discovery’s deal for WarnerMedia. “This has the benefit of not requiring incremental debt, but [Paramount’s] controlling shareholders don’t cash out,” Cahall wrote. A third possible option: Warner Bros. Discovery acquires National Amusements Inc. for approximately $2 billion to get NAI’s Paramount Class A shares, giving Zaslav & Co. the ability to make divestitures prior to an all-stock merger of WBD-Paramount Global. “We see this as the lowest risk (i.e., best) option for WBD (smaller outlay),” according to the Wells Fargo analyst. “This also gives NAI immediate cash so may be most probable.”
[ad_2]
Source link